The main LLM routing techniques
Rule-based routing maps known request types to known models. Capability routing filters by requirements such as tool use, context size or multimodal support. Cost routing selects the least expensive eligible option, while latency routing prefers faster providers or regions.
Quality routing can use evaluations or a classifier to choose among models, but it is harder to debug. Most production systems benefit from deterministic constraints before any learned or probabilistic router is allowed to choose.
- Rule-based routing for predictable workloads.
- Capability routing for tools, vision, context or structured output.
- Cost-aware routing inside a permitted model set.
- Latency-aware routing for interactive applications.
- Provider routing for regional or availability constraints.
- Fallback routing after defined transient failures.
Multi-LLM routing architecture
The router should sit behind a stable gateway interface so applications do not need provider-specific logic. A routing policy receives request metadata, evaluates eligible targets, chooses one and records the reason for that choice.
Keep routing configuration versioned and observable. When output quality or cost changes, operators need to know whether the model changed, the provider changed or the routing policy changed.
How to evaluate an LLM router
Test the same workload against a fixed-model baseline and the routing policy. Measure cost, latency, error rate, quality and the percentage of requests sent to each model.
A router is only useful if the savings or reliability gains are larger than the quality variance and debugging complexity it introduces.